Triple
T1978344
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | paranoiac-critical method |
E42966
|
entity |
| Predicate | techniqueType |
P14965
|
FINISHED |
| Object | imaginative transformation of reality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imaginative transformation of reality | Statement: [paranoiac-critical method, techniqueType, imaginative transformation of reality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: techniqueType Context triple: [paranoiac-critical method, techniqueType, imaginative transformation of reality]
-
A.
hasTechnique
Indicates that an entity employs, utilizes, or is associated with a particular method, procedure, or technique.
-
B.
artisticTechnique
chosen
Indicates the method, style, or process used to create or execute an artistic work.
-
C.
isTechnical
Indicates that an entity possesses specialized technical knowledge, skills, or characteristics related to technology, engineering, or applied sciences.
-
D.
observingTechnique
Indicates the method or procedure used to carry out an observation.
-
E.
technologicalFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8871289048190b00b0d7744b7b2b1 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb43011188190b6a41c004e9e4802 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abaff9a09c8190a81fa13f4b85bc79 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.