Triple

T1975165
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of Poland E42892 entity
Predicate judgesNominatedBy P25708 FINISHED
Object National Council of the Judiciary of Poland
The National Council of the Judiciary of Poland is a constitutional body responsible for safeguarding judicial independence and participating in the appointment and promotion of judges in Poland.
E222603 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Council of the Judiciary of Poland | Statement: [Supreme Court of Poland, judgesNominatedBy, National Council of the Judiciary of Poland]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Council of the Judiciary of Poland
Context triple: [Supreme Court of Poland, judgesNominatedBy, National Council of the Judiciary of Poland]
  • A. Supreme Court of Poland
    The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
  • B. Supreme National Tribunal of Poland
    The Supreme National Tribunal of Poland was a post-World War II special court established to prosecute major Nazi war criminals and collaborators for crimes committed on Polish territory.
  • C. State Tribunal of Poland
    The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
  • D. Council of State of the Kingdom of Poland
    The Council of State of the Kingdom of Poland was the central governmental body in Congress Poland that advised the monarch and participated in legislative and administrative affairs during the 19th century.
  • E. Constitutional Court of Hungary
    The Constitutional Court of Hungary is the country’s highest body for constitutional review, responsible for overseeing the conformity of laws and government actions with the Hungarian Constitution.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: National Council of the Judiciary of Poland
Triple: [Supreme Court of Poland, judgesNominatedBy, National Council of the Judiciary of Poland]
Generated description
The National Council of the Judiciary of Poland is a constitutional body responsible for safeguarding judicial independence and participating in the appointment and promotion of judges in Poland.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Council of the Judiciary of Poland
Target entity description: The National Council of the Judiciary of Poland is a constitutional body responsible for safeguarding judicial independence and participating in the appointment and promotion of judges in Poland.
  • A. Supreme Court of Poland
    The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
  • B. Supreme National Tribunal of Poland
    The Supreme National Tribunal of Poland was a post-World War II special court established to prosecute major Nazi war criminals and collaborators for crimes committed on Polish territory.
  • C. State Tribunal of Poland
    The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
  • D. Council of State of the Kingdom of Poland
    The Council of State of the Kingdom of Poland was the central governmental body in Congress Poland that advised the monarch and participated in legislative and administrative affairs during the 19th century.
  • E. Constitutional Court of Hungary
    The Constitutional Court of Hungary is the country’s highest body for constitutional review, responsible for overseeing the conformity of laws and government actions with the Hungarian Constitution.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judgesNominatedBy
Context triple: [Supreme Court of Poland, judgesNominatedBy, National Council of the Judiciary of Poland]
  • A. nominationReceivedBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity has received a nomination from another entity or source.
  • B. nominationsFrom
    Indicates that one entity has put forward or proposed another entity as a candidate for a position, award, or recognition.
  • C. nominationsAnnouncedBy
    Indicates that one entity publicly announces or reveals the nominations associated with another entity.
  • D. nominatedFrom
    Indicates that an entity has been put forward or proposed as a candidate originating from a particular source, group, or jurisdiction.
  • E. nominationOutcome
    Indicates the result or status that a nomination process yields for a candidate or entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8871289048190b00b0d7744b7b2b1 completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb3f835108190b0709ccf3a487a96 completed March 7, 2026, 5:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae03256a6c81909885fc3618c9c009 completed March 8, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69ae04128e048190a6a36e528586445a completed March 8, 2026, 11:19 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69ae049b7b1c81908bae4acd269ce36e completed March 8, 2026, 11:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abaff9a09c8190a81fa13f4b85bc79 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.