Triple

T19680595
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AGR E472573 entity
Predicate typicalAssignments P12230 FINISHED
Object unit full-time staff positions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unit full-time staff positions | Statement: [AGR, typicalAssignments, unit full-time staff positions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAssignments
Context triple: [AGR, typicalAssignments, unit full-time staff positions]
  • A. assignmentType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of assignment associated with an entity or activity.
  • B. typicalStudentAssignment
    Indicates that an assignment is a standard or commonly expected task given to a student in a particular educational context.
  • C. traditionallyAssignedTo
    Indicates that something is customarily or historically designated as the responsibility, role, or domain of a particular entity according to tradition.
  • D. assignmentBasis
    Indicates the criterion or rationale on which an assignment or allocation is determined.
  • E. typicalIn chosen
    Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e514f2e08190ba70a4449519d218 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e641bf97348190bc31b00ed4ec6cad completed April 20, 2026, 3:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e53039ea808190a9106a53f564ab92 completed April 19, 2026, 7:42 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:45 p.m.