Triple
T19678050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Robert Audi |
E472506
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWritten |
P2831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Structure of Justification |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Structure of Justification | Statement: [Robert Audi, hasWritten, The Structure of Justification]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Structure of Justification Context triple: [Robert Audi, hasWritten, The Structure of Justification]
-
A.
The Justification of the Good
The Justification of the Good is a major philosophical work by Russian thinker Vladimir Solovyov that develops a comprehensive Christian ethical system grounded in the idea of universal moral progress and divine love.
-
B.
The Doctrine of Justification
The Doctrine of Justification is a theological work examining the Christian doctrine of how humans are made righteous before God, often engaging with biblical, historical, and philosophical perspectives.
-
C.
The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice
The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice is a philosophical work by Rainer Forst that develops a constructivist account of justice grounded in the idea that all norms must be justifiable to those affected by them.
-
D.
Epistemic Justification
Epistemic Justification is a work in philosophy that examines how and when beliefs are rationally supported by evidence and reasoning.
-
E.
The Right to Justification
The Right to Justification is a seminal work in political philosophy that develops a theory of justice grounded in individuals’ fundamental claim to receive and give reasons for the norms that govern them.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Structure of Justification Target entity description: The Structure of Justification is a major work in contemporary epistemology by Robert Audi that systematically develops a theory of how beliefs are justified and knowledge is grounded.
-
A.
The Justification of the Good
The Justification of the Good is a major philosophical work by Russian thinker Vladimir Solovyov that develops a comprehensive Christian ethical system grounded in the idea of universal moral progress and divine love.
-
B.
The Doctrine of Justification
The Doctrine of Justification is a theological work examining the Christian doctrine of how humans are made righteous before God, often engaging with biblical, historical, and philosophical perspectives.
-
C.
The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice
The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice is a philosophical work by Rainer Forst that develops a constructivist account of justice grounded in the idea that all norms must be justifiable to those affected by them.
-
D.
Epistemic Justification
Epistemic Justification is a work in philosophy that examines how and when beliefs are rationally supported by evidence and reasoning.
-
E.
The Right to Justification
The Right to Justification is a seminal work in political philosophy that develops a theory of justice grounded in individuals’ fundamental claim to receive and give reasons for the norms that govern them.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e514f2e08190ba70a4449519d218 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e641bda8348190b0c7816c50aca923 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:45 p.m.