Triple
T1966462
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Evarts Act |
E42697
|
entity |
| Predicate | impactOnCaseFlow |
P33298
|
FINISHED |
| Object | shifted most routine appeals to intermediate courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shifted most routine appeals to intermediate courts | Statement: [Evarts Act, impactOnCaseFlow, shifted most routine appeals to intermediate courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impactOnCaseFlow Context triple: [Evarts Act, impactOnCaseFlow, shifted most routine appeals to intermediate courts]
-
A.
impactOnPerformance
Indicates that one entity has an effect, influence, or consequence on the performance level or effectiveness of another entity.
-
B.
affectedCourt
Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
-
C.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
D.
usesCaseManagementSystem
Indicates that an entity makes use of a case management system to organize, track, or handle cases or workflows.
-
E.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88711151c8190940b2572095059d7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb3cd47388190998b5f6800141c92 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abaff7d4a48190ab0d51aefb1c4e31 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb16a6db48190af04012e8ed2269f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.