Triple
T19660911
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kintetsu ATS |
E472076
|
entity |
| Predicate | responseToViolation |
P88945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | automatic brake application |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: automatic brake application | Statement: [Kintetsu ATS, responseToViolation, automatic brake application]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responseToViolation Context triple: [Kintetsu ATS, responseToViolation, automatic brake application]
-
A.
responseToAbuse
Indicates a reaction, behavior, or measure taken by one party in consequence of abusive actions or treatment from another.
-
B.
violationOf
Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
-
C.
responseToWarning
Indicates how an entity reacts or behaves in consequence to a prior warning.
-
D.
responseIfAccessViolation
chosen
Indicates the system behavior or output that is triggered when an access violation or unauthorized access attempt occurs.
-
E.
responseToIntrusion
Indicates a reaction or counteraction taken in response to an intrusion or unauthorized entry.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51395348190ac1416d46dfc6db0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6414a667c81909aad04a737773c7e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e941008190898d978d7bde91e4 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:45 p.m.