Triple
T196065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems |
E3821
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReviewProcess |
P1410
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single-blind peer review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single-blind peer review | Statement: [IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, hasReviewProcess, single-blind peer review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReviewProcess Context triple: [IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, hasReviewProcess, single-blind peer review]
-
A.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
-
B.
hasProcess
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is characterized by a particular process.
-
C.
checkedBy
Indicates that an entity has been examined, verified, or reviewed by another entity.
-
D.
hasLegislativeProcess
Indicates that there exists a specific legislative procedure or set of steps governing how laws or regulations are proposed, debated, and enacted for the related entity.
-
E.
standardOfReview
Indicates the level and type of scrutiny an authority (such as a court or reviewer) applies when evaluating a prior decision, action, or finding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25983b49c819080f7e161904c53da |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25677da14819094cd02868fd30c83 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.