Triple
T19538736
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alfred Traeger |
E488836
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedForUseIn |
P11902
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Australian outback |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australian outback | Statement: [Alfred Traeger, developedForUseIn, Australian outback]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedForUseIn Context triple: [Alfred Traeger, developedForUseIn, Australian outback]
-
A.
developedForProduct
Indicates that something (such as a component, feature, or service) was specifically created or tailored to be used with or support a particular product.
-
B.
developedForProgram
Indicates that something was created, designed, or produced specifically to be used in or support a particular program.
-
C.
originallyDevelopedFor
chosen
Indicates that something was first created, designed, or produced with the primary purpose of serving a particular use, user group, context, or application.
-
D.
developedForLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a tool, system, or resource) was specifically created or adapted to be used with a particular language.
-
E.
developedForVendor
Indicates that something (such as a product, service, or solution) was specifically created or tailored to meet the needs or requirements of a particular vendor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8db5b6c8190984b61f91981f575 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e638710b8c81908335535869fc9130 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514c9c00481909b76bda67957e58b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:41 p.m.