Triple
T19519111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Interstate 696 |
E488358
|
entity |
| Predicate | abbreviation |
P43
|
FINISHED |
| Object | I-696 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: I-696 | Statement: [Interstate 696, abbreviation, I-696]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: I-696 Context triple: [Interstate 696, abbreviation, I-696]
-
A.
I-696
I-696 is an east–west interstate highway in the Detroit metropolitan area of Michigan, serving as a key commuter and bypass route through suburbs including Southfield.
-
B.
Interstate 696
chosen
Interstate 696 is an east–west auxiliary Interstate Highway in the Detroit metropolitan area of Michigan, connecting several northern suburbs and serving as a major commuter and commercial route.
-
C.
I-635
I-635 is an auxiliary Interstate Highway that serves as a major beltway and bypass route around parts of the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area in Texas.
-
D.
I-269
I-269 is an auxiliary Interstate Highway forming part of the outer beltway around the Memphis metropolitan area in Tennessee and Mississippi.
-
E.
Interstate 694
Interstate 694 is a beltway freeway forming part of the loop around the Twin Cities metropolitan area in Minnesota.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8da8bec819081f400199491ccc3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6359edd508190afd68739de676ed7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.