Triple
T1950759
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zion theology |
E42151
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedInTradition |
P29110
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancient Israelite religion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ancient Israelite religion | Statement: [Zion theology, developedInTradition, ancient Israelite religion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedInTradition Context triple: [Zion theology, developedInTradition, ancient Israelite religion]
-
A.
traditionInheritedFrom
Indicates that a tradition has been passed down or derived from an earlier source, group, or culture.
-
B.
placesInTradition
Indicates that one entity is situated, interpreted, or understood within the context or framework of a particular tradition.
-
C.
influencedTradition
chosen
Indicates that one entity has had a shaping or guiding effect on the development, practices, or values of a particular tradition.
-
D.
appearsInSourceTradition
Indicates that something is attested, mentioned, or present within a particular source tradition (such as a textual, cultural, or scholarly tradition).
-
E.
traditionSince
Indicates that a tradition has been continuously practiced or recognized starting from a specified point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8870e08fc8190a319cbf2600db15f |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb34d94fc8190a5bf1e582c77c725 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abaff3eda88190b643994cb4dfb8df |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.