Triple
T19503590
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Land van Cuijk |
E487964
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsSettlement |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stevensbeek |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stevensbeek | Statement: [Land van Cuijk, containsSettlement, Stevensbeek]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stevensbeek Context triple: [Land van Cuijk, containsSettlement, Stevensbeek]
-
A.
Stevensbeek
chosen
Stevensbeek is a small village in the Dutch province of North Brabant, known for its rural character and tranquil surroundings.
-
B.
Vierlingsbeek
Vierlingsbeek is a village in the Dutch province of North Brabant, known for its rural character and location along the river Maas.
-
C.
Prinsenbeek
Prinsenbeek is a village in the Dutch province of North Brabant, now part of the municipality of Breda and known for its suburban character and proximity to the city.
-
D.
Heiligenbergerbeek
Heiligenbergerbeek is a small stream in the Netherlands that flows through the Randenbroek area of Amersfoort.
-
E.
Everbeek
Everbeek is a village in the municipality of Brakel in East Flanders, Belgium, known for its rural landscape and wooded surroundings.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6350f8d888190a4809c83522933d4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.