Triple

T1949645
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern Baptist Convention E42128 entity
Predicate hasFacedControversy P1783 FINISHED
Object sexual abuse scandals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sexual abuse scandals | Statement: [Southern Baptist Convention, hasFacedControversy, sexual abuse scandals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFacedControversy
Context triple: [Southern Baptist Convention, hasFacedControversy, sexual abuse scandals]
  • A. roleInControversy
    Indicates the specific part, involvement, or function an entity has within a particular controversy or disputed situation.
  • B. controversy chosen
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • C. locationOfControversy
    Indicates the place or setting where a dispute, debate, or controversy occurs or is centered.
  • D. hasLongTermDebateOn
    Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
  • E. notableConflictWith
    Indicates a significant, recognized conflict or dispute that exists or has existed between the related entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8870e08fc8190a319cbf2600db15f completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb332b014819085bfc88d66cfc10a completed March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abaff3eda88190b643994cb4dfb8df completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.