Triple
T19470833
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John-Paul |
E487117
|
entity |
| Predicate | meaningOfComponentJohn |
P62029
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yahweh is gracious |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yahweh is gracious | Statement: [John-Paul, meaningOfComponentJohn, Yahweh is gracious]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: meaningOfComponentJohn Context triple: [John-Paul, meaningOfComponentJohn, Yahweh is gracious]
-
A.
hasMeaningViaJohn
Indicates that something possesses or conveys its meaning specifically through John as the interpretive or mediating agent.
-
B.
meaningComponent
Indicates that one entity represents a semantic or conceptual component contributing to the overall meaning of another entity.
-
C.
meaningComponent郎
Indicates that one entity is a semantic component or constituent part of the overall meaning of another entity.
-
D.
meaningOfComponent R
chosen
Indicates that one entity represents the meaning, interpretation, or semantic content of another component.
-
E.
roleOfJohn Fred Young
Indicates that John holds or performs the role associated with Fred Young.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d86d608190bd199a98d0297f27 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e633e809008190b0021d41b99f9700 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4fd7883308190b73912a71a35a835 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.