Triple
T1945899
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Austroasiatic |
E42054
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Khasi language |
E216900
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Khasi language | Statement: [Austroasiatic, hasLanguage, Khasi language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Khasi language Context triple: [Austroasiatic, hasLanguage, Khasi language]
-
A.
Khasi language
chosen
Khasi language is an Austroasiatic language spoken primarily in the northeastern Indian state of Meghalaya by the Khasi people.
-
B.
Karbi language
The Karbi language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken primarily by the Karbi people in Northeast India, especially in Assam.
-
C.
Chakma language
The Chakma language is an Indo-Aryan language spoken primarily by the Chakma people of Bangladesh and northeastern India.
-
D.
Lepcha language
The Lepcha language is an indigenous Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Lepcha people in parts of Sikkim and neighboring regions of India, Bhutan, and Nepal, known for its unique script and rich oral tradition.
-
E.
Pa’O language
The Pa’O language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken primarily by the Pa’O (Taungthu) people of Myanmar, especially in Shan and Kayin States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8870e08fc8190a319cbf2600db15f |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb300af2481908ae359972843c1ef |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:09 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae03180a248190a0df96066923728a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.