Triple

T19376374
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Church in Corinth E484677 entity
Predicate hasNotableThemeInLetters P7671 FINISHED
Object Christian unity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Christian unity | Statement: [Church in Corinth, hasNotableThemeInLetters, Christian unity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableThemeInLetters
Context triple: [Church in Corinth, hasNotableThemeInLetters, Christian unity]
  • A. hasSayingTheme
    Indicates that a saying, proverb, or quoted expression is about or centers on a particular theme or subject.
  • B. hasNotableWord
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a word or term that is considered notable, distinctive, or significant in some context.
  • C. notableTheme chosen
    Indicates that a particular theme is prominently featured in, or strongly associated with, an entity such as a work, event, or body of content.
  • D. hasLettersFor
    Indicates that one entity possesses or contains written correspondence intended for another entity.
  • E. hasNicknameTheme
    Indicates that an entity’s nickname is based on or associated with a particular theme or motif.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d460d88190abf0591c5c9d2b0c completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e61a5c05c08190b91cb32fdb79813b completed April 20, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd54f8e48190956e73dd8969164a completed April 19, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:35 p.m.