Triple
T19354876
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kivalina v. ExxonMobil |
E484115
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasisAlleged |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal common law of public nuisance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal common law of public nuisance | Statement: [Kivalina v. ExxonMobil, legalBasisAlleged, federal common law of public nuisance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisAlleged Context triple: [Kivalina v. ExxonMobil, legalBasisAlleged, federal common law of public nuisance]
-
A.
legalBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
legalBasisWeakenedBy
Indicates that the legal force, validity, or effectiveness of something is reduced or undermined by another factor, action, or decision.
-
C.
legalStandingBasis
Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
-
D.
allegedClause
Indicates that a clause or statement is claimed or asserted to be true, typically without confirmed proof or legal determination.
-
E.
hasAllegedJustification
Indicates that an action, event, or claim is said or claimed to have a justification, but that justification is not established as factual or proven.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6190794188190a94de464d985b5fd |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd13a8cc81909cd02668564c9f29 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.