Triple
T19332909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dargwa |
E483539
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialects |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kajtak dialect |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kajtak dialect | Statement: [Dargwa, hasDialects, Kajtak dialect]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kajtak dialect Context triple: [Dargwa, hasDialects, Kajtak dialect]
-
A.
Kajtak language
chosen
The Kajtak language is a Northeast Caucasian language spoken by the Dargin people in Dagestan, Russia, considered one of the dialects or varieties within the broader Dargic linguistic group.
-
B.
Malgavet dialect
The Malgavet dialect is a regional variety of the Lihir language spoken on the Lihir Islands of Papua New Guinea.
-
C.
Krakolye dialect
The Krakolye dialect is a regional variety of the Votic language traditionally spoken in and around the village of Krakolye in Ingria.
-
D.
Juhar dialect
The Juhar dialect is a regional variety of the Karo Batak language spoken by the Karo people of North Sumatra, Indonesia.
-
E.
Bakana dialect
The Bakana dialect is a regional variety of the Kalabari Ijo language spoken by communities in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e61642f49c81909226cfd701f7c139 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.