Triple
T19329323
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Call Me |
E483442
|
entity |
| Predicate | followedBy |
P78
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Livin' for You |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Livin' for You | Statement: [Call Me, followedBy, Livin' for You]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Livin' for You Context triple: [Call Me, followedBy, Livin' for You]
-
A.
Livin' for You
chosen
"Livin' for You" is a 1973 soul album by Al Green that showcases his smooth vocals and Willie Mitchell's signature Hi Records production.
-
B.
I Live for Your Love
"I Live for Your Love" is a 1988 R&B and pop ballad by American singer Natalie Cole that became one of her signature hits in the late 1980s.
-
C.
Living with You
"Living with You" is a song featured on Kenny Rogers' 1983 country-pop album "Eyes That See in the Dark," which was largely written and produced by the Bee Gees.
-
D.
Lovin’ You for Life
"Lovin’ You for Life" is a song featured on the posthumous Notorious B.I.G. and Faith Evans collaborative album *The King & I*.
-
E.
For You to Love
"For You to Love" is an R&B ballad by Freddie Jackson featured on his 1988 album "Don't Let Love Slip Away."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6163ffddc81909e9cb13e780f1f18 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.