Triple
T19327967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hensel’s lemma |
E483408
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in p-adic analysis |
C24993
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in p-adic analysis Context triple: [Hensel’s lemma, instanceOf, result in p-adic analysis]
-
A.
result in arithmetic geometry
chosen
A result in arithmetic geometry is a theorem or proposition that connects number-theoretic properties of solutions to polynomial equations with the geometric structure of the varieties they define over arithmetic fields.
-
B.
result in real analysis
In real analysis, a result is a proven mathematical statement—such as a theorem, lemma, proposition, or corollary—that establishes a specific property or relationship about real-valued functions, sequences, sets, or structures on the real numbers.
-
C.
result in complex analysis
A result in complex analysis is a proven statement or theorem about functions of a complex variable, often revealing deep relationships between analytic, geometric, and topological properties in the complex plane.
-
D.
object of analytic number theory
An object of analytic number theory is a mathematical entity—such as a function, sequence, or set of numbers—studied using tools of analysis (like complex analysis, Fourier analysis, or measure theory) to understand the distribution and properties of integers and related structures.
-
E.
result in additive number theory
A result in additive number theory is a theorem or proposition that describes how integers can be expressed as sums of other integers, often revealing structural or combinatorial properties of sets under addition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.