Triple
T19323635
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Box Elder County |
E483290
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Honeyville, Utah |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Honeyville, Utah | Statement: [Box Elder County, contains, Honeyville, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Honeyville, Utah Context triple: [Box Elder County, contains, Honeyville, Utah]
-
A.
Honeyville, Utah
chosen
Honeyville, Utah is a small rural city in northern Utah known for its agricultural community and proximity to natural hot springs.
-
B.
Hoytsville, Utah
Hoytsville, Utah is a small unincorporated rural community in northeastern Utah known for its agricultural character and proximity to the Wasatch Mountains.
-
C.
Lynndyl, Utah
Lynndyl, Utah is a small rural town in central Utah known for its agricultural surroundings and proximity to major rail lines.
-
D.
Elwood, Utah
Elwood, Utah is a small rural town located in northern Utah within the Bear River Valley.
-
E.
Mt. Pleasant, Utah
Mt. Pleasant, Utah is a small historic city in central Utah known for its pioneer-era architecture and rural, agricultural character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e60d8a07508190a2e5f8972d1efba0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.