Triple
T19318689
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Los Angeles municipal elections |
E483162
|
entity |
| Predicate | alignedWithStateElectionsAfterReform |
P135577
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Los Angeles municipal elections, alignedWithStateElectionsAfterReform, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignedWithStateElectionsAfterReform Context triple: [Los Angeles municipal elections, alignedWithStateElectionsAfterReform, true]
-
A.
formedAfterElection
Indicates that an entity (such as a government, cabinet, or committee) was established or came into existence following the conclusion of an election.
-
B.
legalStatusAfterReform
Indicates the legal status or condition an entity holds following the implementation of a specific reform or legal change.
-
C.
changedElectoralSystem
Indicates that an entity has altered or replaced a previously existing electoral system with a different one.
-
D.
associatedWithPoliticalRealignment
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, involved in, or influenced by a significant shift or restructuring in political alignments or party coalitions.
-
E.
redistrictedAfter
Indicates that one districting arrangement or boundary configuration was created or implemented following, and typically as a result of, another districting arrangement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e60d868dd48190b1439a5f4ff58c48 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4e4709d4481908c280cdd2ac18977 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.