Triple

T19315465
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Modigliani–Miller theorem E483085 entity
Predicate hasProposition P17650 FINISHED
Object Proposition I NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proposition I | Statement: [Modigliani–Miller theorem, hasProposition, Proposition I]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Proposition I
Context triple: [Modigliani–Miller theorem, hasProposition, Proposition I]
  • A. Proposition 24
    Proposition 24 is a California ballot measure that strengthened and expanded the state’s consumer data privacy protections by creating new rights and enforcement mechanisms.
  • B. Proposition 11 (2008)
    Proposition 11 (2008) was a California ballot measure that transferred the power to draw state legislative district boundaries from the legislature to an independent citizens’ redistricting commission.
  • C. Proposition 1A (2008)
    Proposition 1A (2008) was a California ballot measure that authorized billions in bonds to begin funding the state’s high-speed rail system.
  • D. Proposition 20 (2010)
    Proposition 20 (2010) was a California ballot measure that expanded the authority of the state's independent citizens redistricting commission to include drawing congressional district boundaries.
  • E. Proposition 2½ property tax limits
    Proposition 2½ property tax limits are Massachusetts laws that cap how much cities and towns can raise property taxes each year and in total, significantly constraining local revenue growth.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Proposition I
Target entity description: Proposition I is the core Modigliani–Miller result stating that, under idealized market conditions, a firm’s value is independent of its capital structure.
  • A. Proposition 24
    Proposition 24 is a California ballot measure that strengthened and expanded the state’s consumer data privacy protections by creating new rights and enforcement mechanisms.
  • B. Proposition 11 (2008)
    Proposition 11 (2008) was a California ballot measure that transferred the power to draw state legislative district boundaries from the legislature to an independent citizens’ redistricting commission.
  • C. Proposition 1A (2008)
    Proposition 1A (2008) was a California ballot measure that authorized billions in bonds to begin funding the state’s high-speed rail system.
  • D. Proposition 20 (2010)
    Proposition 20 (2010) was a California ballot measure that expanded the authority of the state's independent citizens redistricting commission to include drawing congressional district boundaries.
  • E. Proposition 2½ property tax limits
    Proposition 2½ property tax limits are Massachusetts laws that cap how much cities and towns can raise property taxes each year and in total, significantly constraining local revenue growth.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProposition
Context triple: [Modigliani–Miller theorem, hasProposition, Proposition I]
  • A. hasInfluentialProposition
    Indicates that one entity has a proposition or statement that significantly shapes, guides, or impacts the ideas, decisions, or behavior of another entity.
  • B. hasProposal
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is the subject of a specific proposal.
  • C. hasProposed
    Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
  • D. notableProposition chosen
    Indicates that a subject is associated with a proposition, statement, or claim that is considered notable or significant in some context.
  • E. numberOfPropositions
    Indicates the total count of distinct propositions associated with or contained within a given entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e60d833034819092a8414d5e0fc26e completed April 20, 2026, 11:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a completed April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.