Triple

T19308161
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Charles Willing Byrd E482895 entity
Predicate father P120 FINISHED
Object William Byrd NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: William Byrd | Statement: [Charles Willing Byrd, father, William Byrd]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: William Byrd
Context triple: [Charles Willing Byrd, father, William Byrd]
  • A. William Byrd chosen
    William Byrd was a prominent English Renaissance composer and organist known for his influential sacred and secular vocal music.
  • B. Orlando Gibbons
    Orlando Gibbons was a prominent late Tudor and early Stuart English composer, organist, and virginalist known for his sacred choral music and keyboard works.
  • C. Thomas Morley
    Thomas Morley was a prominent English Renaissance composer, organist, and music theorist best known for his influential madrigals and contributions to Elizabethan secular music.
  • D. Thomas Tallis
    Thomas Tallis was a seminal 16th-century English composer renowned for his sacred choral music and lasting influence on later composers.
  • E. Thomas Weelkes
    Thomas Weelkes was an English Renaissance composer and organist best known for his expressive madrigals and sacred choral music.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e604cb47c88190bd01e6f5f4d2204f completed April 20, 2026, 10:49 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.