Triple

T19269233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cassegrain telescope design E481876 entity
Predicate hasSecondaryMirrorType P135375 FINISHED
Object hyperboloidal mirror LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hyperboloidal mirror | Statement: [Cassegrain telescope design, hasSecondaryMirrorType, hyperboloidal mirror]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecondaryMirrorType
Context triple: [Cassegrain telescope design, hasSecondaryMirrorType, hyperboloidal mirror]
  • A. hasSecondaryMirrorPosition
    Indicates the spatial placement or configuration of a secondary mirror relative to the primary optical system.
  • B. hasPrimaryMirrorType
    Indicates the specific type or design of the primary mirror associated with an optical system or instrument.
  • C. hasSecondary
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an additional or subordinate counterpart beyond its primary one.
  • D. secondaryMirrorDesignation
    Indicates the specific label or identifier assigned to a secondary mirror in an optical or telescope system.
  • E. hasSecondaryUsage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an additional, non-primary function or purpose beyond its main intended use.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8ce54cc8190998418ff1f66ef28 completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5fbb68d0c819083ba0ce680dd7d99 completed April 20, 2026, 10:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dd07a7208190afcd51ba1dc87c33 completed April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e4df51ac6c819091ce72b07790ffa6 completed April 19, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 p.m.