Triple
T19256470
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ralphe Armstrong |
E481526
|
entity |
| Predicate | workedWith |
P398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Carlos Santana |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carlos Santana | Statement: [Ralphe Armstrong, workedWith, Carlos Santana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Carlos Santana Context triple: [Ralphe Armstrong, workedWith, Carlos Santana]
-
A.
Carlos Santana
chosen
Carlos Santana is a Mexican-American guitarist and bandleader renowned for pioneering a fusion of rock, Latin music, and jazz, especially through his work with the band Santana.
-
B.
Santos Santana
Santos Santana is a music producer and member of the hip-hop collective and production group Internet Money.
-
C.
Santana
Santana is a municipality on the northern coast of Madeira Island in Portugal, known for its traditional thatched houses and mountainous landscapes.
-
D.
Santana
Santana is a Brazilian municipality in the state of Amapá, known as an important port city in the Amazon River region.
-
E.
Santana
Santana is a common Portuguese and Spanish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across sports, music, and other fields.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8cd9d1081908a181d02b88b59b8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fb3572c08190a55f1c71cdb18b42 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 p.m.