Triple

T19251074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject President of the Orange Free State E481392 entity
Predicate lastHolderEnd P33300 FINISHED
Object 1902 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1902 | Statement: [President of the Orange Free State, lastHolderEnd, 1902]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lastHolderEnd
Context triple: [President of the Orange Free State, lastHolderEnd, 1902]
  • A. firstHolderEnd
    Indicates that the specified entity is the one who initially held something and that this holding relationship has come to an end.
  • B. lastHolder
    Indicates that the subject is the most recent entity to have possessed, owned, or held the object.
  • C. termEndOfLastHolder chosen
    Indicates that something marks the end point of the term or tenure of the most recent previous holder of a role, position, or asset.
  • D. lastHolderAsCount
    Indicates that the referenced entity was the most recent holder of something, with the relationship expressed in terms of a count or number of times it held that thing.
  • E. heldByEnd
    Indicates that an object or item is being held or supported specifically at one of its ends by an agent or another object.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8cd9d1081908a181d02b88b59b8 completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5fb30bf6c819094c44aceb544a023 completed April 20, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dd002d00819088b625056edfb74e completed April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:27 p.m.