Triple
T192431
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ALICE |
E3748
|
entity |
| Predicate | upgradeFeature |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | continuous readout capability |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continuous readout capability | Statement: [ALICE, upgradeFeature, continuous readout capability]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: upgradeFeature Context triple: [ALICE, upgradeFeature, continuous readout capability]
-
A.
upgradeProgram
Indicates that one entity improves, enhances, or replaces another entity’s program with a more advanced or updated version.
-
B.
plannedUpgrade
Indicates that an entity has a scheduled or intended improvement or enhancement to be carried out in the future.
-
C.
updated
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or status.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
elevatedTo
Indicates that one entity is promoted or raised to a higher rank, status, position, or level relative to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a259669ba08190a5be1d2e10e70b27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2567567508190b3a41329a15c7156 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.