Triple
T1922705
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Portland Police Chief |
E40158
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayHoldRank |
P7007
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chief of Police |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chief of Police | Statement: [Portland Police Chief, mayHoldRank, Chief of Police]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayHoldRank Context triple: [Portland Police Chief, mayHoldRank, Chief of Police]
-
A.
mayHold
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
-
B.
typicallyHoldsRank
chosen
Indicates that an entity is most commonly or usually associated with holding a particular rank or level in a hierarchy.
-
C.
eligibleRank
Indicates that an entity meets the required rank or level criteria to qualify for a specific role, action, or benefit.
-
D.
isOnlyPersonToHoldRank
Indicates that a person is the sole individual ever to have held a particular rank, with no others sharing that rank at any time.
-
E.
isCommandedByRankSometimes
Indicates that an entity is, at certain times or under some conditions, under the authority or control of another entity by virtue of that other entity’s rank.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864298748190a2f2fd34f7ef8d77 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb23459ac819088ded5bfac9d4aad |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafed2ab481908920334e77b1021b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:35 p.m.