Triple

T192269
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Compact Linear Collider test facilities E3745 entity
Predicate developsTechnologyFor P5334 FINISHED
Object future multi-TeV electron–positron collider LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: future multi-TeV electron–positron collider | Statement: [Compact Linear Collider test facilities, developsTechnologyFor, future multi-TeV electron–positron collider]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsTechnologyFor
Context triple: [Compact Linear Collider test facilities, developsTechnologyFor, future multi-TeV electron–positron collider]
  • A. technologyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of technology associated with an entity or relationship.
  • B. technologyLevel
    Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
  • C. associatedWithTechnology
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved with, or utilizes a particular technology.
  • D. technologyParadigm
    Indicates a relationship where one entity represents or defines the overarching technological model, framework, or approach within which another entity operates or is categorized.
  • E. developed
    Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a259669ba08190a5be1d2e10e70b27 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2567567508190b3a41329a15c7156 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25710bdfc81909b6697159104cf53 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.