Triple
T19218985
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ken Gharial Sanctuary |
E480558
|
entity |
| Predicate | conservationStatusFocusSpecies |
P59532
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gharial is critically endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gharial is critically endangered | Statement: [Ken Gharial Sanctuary, conservationStatusFocusSpecies, gharial is critically endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conservationStatusFocusSpecies Context triple: [Ken Gharial Sanctuary, conservationStatusFocusSpecies, gharial is critically endangered]
-
A.
conservationFocusSpecies
Indicates that a conservation effort, program, or context is specifically directed toward or centered on a particular species.
-
B.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
C.
wildlifeProtectionStatus
Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
-
D.
subjectSpeciesStatus
chosen
Indicates the conservation or biological status assigned to the subject species (e.g., endangered, native, invasive, protected).
-
E.
hasConservationConcernIn
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8cb8c348190b52075823911c869 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fa3d5684819092d3083f65ea90d5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dcf22b3c8190bee02e3af946e114 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:23 p.m.