Triple

T1918513
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Green Square E40072 entity
Predicate hasNotableType P33147 FINISHED
Object central public square LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: central public square | Statement: [Green Square, hasNotableType, central public square]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableType
Context triple: [Green Square, hasNotableType, central public square]
  • A. hasNotableBridgeType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific, noteworthy type or design category of bridge.
  • B. hasNotableSuccessorType
    Indicates that an entity has a successor whose type or category is considered notably significant or distinguished in relation to it.
  • C. hasNotableImplementationAt
    Indicates that something has a significant or noteworthy implementation located at or associated with a particular place, context, or platform.
  • D. hasNotableDescendant
    Indicates that an entity has at least one descendant who is recognized as notable or significant in some context.
  • E. hasNotableSegment
    Indicates that an entity includes or contains a specific segment, part, or portion that is considered notable or significant in some way.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864298748190a2f2fd34f7ef8d77 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb211eda88190865de7a0522a453d completed March 7, 2026, 5:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafed2ab481908920334e77b1021b completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abb1b180e481908bbe893d6ba6208b completed March 7, 2026, 5:03 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:35 p.m.