Triple
T19174849
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of Minnesota in civil litigation |
E469412
|
entity |
| Predicate | canSueFor |
P113668
|
FINISHED |
| Object | enforcement of state laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enforcement of state laws | Statement: [State of Minnesota in civil litigation, canSueFor, enforcement of state laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canSueFor Context triple: [State of Minnesota in civil litigation, canSueFor, enforcement of state laws]
-
A.
canBeSuedFor
Indicates that one party is legally liable or potentially subject to legal action by another party for a specified cause or wrongdoing.
-
B.
canBeSuedAs
Indicates that one entity has legal standing or capacity to be the target of a lawsuit initiated by another entity.
-
C.
mayBeSuedUnder
Indicates that one entity is legally subject to being sued or brought to court under a specified law, statute, or legal framework by another entity.
-
D.
mayProsecute
chosen
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd09d5a081909ae43c286651ae5a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5f166d3888190adaf6dc8531a8ed1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9b83d6881908e6271c620f74100 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:06 p.m.