Triple

T19165890
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Duchy of Poland E469178 entity
Predicate borderedBy P224 FINISHED
Object Pomeranian duchies NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pomeranian duchies | Statement: [Duchy of Poland, borderedBy, Pomeranian duchies]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pomeranian duchies
Context triple: [Duchy of Poland, borderedBy, Pomeranian duchies]
  • A. Duchy of Oels
    The Duchy of Oels was a historical Silesian duchy centered on the town of Oels (Oleśnica), which passed through various dynastic rulers and played a notable role in the regional politics of Central Europe.
  • B. Anhalt principalities
    The Anhalt principalities were a group of small, historically significant German states in central Germany that were ruled by various branches of the House of Ascania until their unification and later incorporation into modern Germany.
  • C. Principality of Grubenhagen
    The Principality of Grubenhagen was a small medieval German principality within the Holy Roman Empire, ruled by a branch of the House of Welf and centered around the town of Herzberg in present-day Lower Saxony.
  • D. Ernestine duchies
    The Ernestine duchies were a group of small, historically significant Thuringian states in the Holy Roman Empire and later Germany, ruled by various branches of the Ernestine line of the Wettin dynasty.
  • E. Principality of Leiningen
    The Principality of Leiningen was a small sovereign state of the Holy Roman Empire and later the Confederation of the Rhine, ruled by the House of Leiningen in what is now southwestern Germany.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pomeranian duchies
Target entity description: The Pomeranian duchies were a group of medieval and early modern feudal states along the southern Baltic coast, ruled by local dukes and often contested between Poland, the Holy Roman Empire, and neighboring powers.
  • A. Duchy of Oels
    The Duchy of Oels was a historical Silesian duchy centered on the town of Oels (Oleśnica), which passed through various dynastic rulers and played a notable role in the regional politics of Central Europe.
  • B. Anhalt principalities
    The Anhalt principalities were a group of small, historically significant German states in central Germany that were ruled by various branches of the House of Ascania until their unification and later incorporation into modern Germany.
  • C. Principality of Grubenhagen
    The Principality of Grubenhagen was a small medieval German principality within the Holy Roman Empire, ruled by a branch of the House of Welf and centered around the town of Herzberg in present-day Lower Saxony.
  • D. Ernestine duchies
    The Ernestine duchies were a group of small, historically significant Thuringian states in the Holy Roman Empire and later Germany, ruled by various branches of the Ernestine line of the Wettin dynasty.
  • E. Principality of Leiningen
    The Principality of Leiningen was a small sovereign state of the Holy Roman Empire and later the Confederation of the Rhine, ruled by the House of Leiningen in what is now southwestern Germany.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd09d5a081909ae43c286651ae5a completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5f15ee064819087f9fd822236298f completed April 20, 2026, 9:26 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:06 p.m.