Triple
T19129759
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 郵政大臣 |
E468283
|
entity |
| Predicate | 責任 |
P42085
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 国会に対する連帯責任 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 国会に対する連帯責任 | Statement: [郵政大臣, 責任, 国会に対する連帯責任]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 責任 Context triple: [郵政大臣, 責任, 国会に対する連帯責任]
-
A.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
B.
تحمله
Indicates that one entity carries, bears, or supports another entity physically, emotionally, or figuratively.
-
C.
obligation
Indicates that one entity is bound or required to perform a duty, action, or fulfill a condition toward another entity or according to a rule or agreement.
-
D.
recallLiability
Indicates a relationship where an entity bears legal or financial responsibility for initiating or managing a product recall.
-
E.
accountabilityTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd0796a48190b34ce4cd9d3f3be5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e3cf8d348190b27fc7d7d39f46f1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9b085288190b974d649e12e0844 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:05 p.m.