Triple
T1911285
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Theaetetus |
E38114
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsDiscussionOf |
P33880
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sense perception |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sense perception | Statement: [Theaetetus, containsDiscussionOf, sense perception]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsDiscussionOf Context triple: [Theaetetus, containsDiscussionOf, sense perception]
-
A.
hasDiscussionSystem
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or supports a system for facilitating discussions or conversations.
-
B.
influencedDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity had an effect on the way another entity was discussed, framed, or debated.
-
C.
frequentlyDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, subject, or entity is often the focus of conversation, debate, or mention within a particular context or medium.
-
D.
hasDiscussionPages
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more pages where discussions or conversations about it take place.
-
E.
canDiscuss
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to engage in a discussion or conversation with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862a26088190aae5243695aeefc0 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb34d94fc8190a5bf1e582c77c725 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafeba3d88190afcce67483d8625b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb34c4a64819096e12b152b84c334 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:35 p.m.