Triple
T19112102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance |
E467813
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Byzantine fault tolerant protocol |
C20070
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Byzantine fault tolerant protocol Context triple: [Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance, instanceOf, Byzantine fault tolerant protocol]
-
A.
Algorand protocol feature
An Algorand protocol feature is a specific built-in capability or mechanism of the Algorand blockchain that enhances its security, scalability, consensus, or smart contract functionality.
-
B.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
C.
blockchain-based protocol
chosen
A blockchain-based protocol is a decentralized set of rules and procedures encoded on a distributed ledger that governs how participants validate, record, and agree on transactions or data without relying on a central authority.
-
D.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
E.
cluster-wide lock manager
A cluster-wide lock manager is a distributed coordination component that provides mutually exclusive access to shared resources across all nodes in a cluster, ensuring consistency and preventing conflicting operations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd06a26481908039e2a1bae8c597 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.