Triple
T19062921
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Better Together |
E466580
|
entity |
| Predicate | opinionOnScottishIndependence |
P134942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | against |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: against | Statement: [Better Together, opinionOnScottishIndependence, against]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opinionOnScottishIndependence Context triple: [Better Together, opinionOnScottishIndependence, against]
-
A.
independenceReferendum
Indicates a formal vote in which a population decides whether a territory or region should become politically independent from its current governing state or authority.
-
B.
subjectOfReferendum
Indicates that something is the issue, proposal, or matter being decided upon in a referendum.
-
C.
referendumRelated
Indicates a relationship where something is connected to, associated with, or arising from a referendum process or its outcomes.
-
D.
heldReferendum
Indicates that an entity organized and conducted a referendum, typically allowing eligible participants to vote directly on a specific issue or proposal.
-
E.
referendumYesPercentage
Indicates the percentage of votes cast in favor of the "yes" option in a referendum.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd040fb881909af2a964f65ad208 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e195ac048190a57b57e585d022d4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b99633c8819097988608c278ecf8 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4c0fc3c4c8190abbfe06e1bd3325c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:03 p.m.