Triple
T19027615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Calgary (Mull) |
E465649
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiredNameOf |
P63
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Calgary, Alberta |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Calgary, Alberta | Statement: [Calgary (Mull), inspiredNameOf, Calgary, Alberta]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Calgary, Alberta Context triple: [Calgary (Mull), inspiredNameOf, Calgary, Alberta]
-
A.
Calgary
Calgary is a small coastal village on the Isle of Mull in Scotland, known for its scenic white-sand beach and surrounding natural beauty.
-
B.
Calgary
chosen
Calgary is a major city in the province of Alberta, Canada, known for its oil and gas industry, proximity to the Rocky Mountains, and the annual Calgary Stampede.
-
C.
Kalgary
Kalgary is a small unincorporated rural community located in Crosby County in the U.S. state of Texas.
-
D.
Edmonton
Edmonton is the capital city of the Canadian province of Alberta, known for its major role in the energy sector and its extensive river valley park system.
-
E.
Edmonton
Edmonton is a historic suburban area in the London Borough of Enfield, formerly part of the county of Middlesex in England.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd0359648190bc2a9202c5cf29d2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d73dc404819092059e496662d151 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:02 p.m.