Triple
T19013
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oppenheimer–Phillips process |
E375
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultsIn |
P374
|
FINISHED |
| Object | residual nucleus with one additional neutron |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: residual nucleus with one additional neutron | Statement: [Oppenheimer–Phillips process, resultsIn, residual nucleus with one additional neutron]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultsIn Context triple: [Oppenheimer–Phillips process, resultsIn, residual nucleus with one additional neutron]
-
A.
result
chosen
Indicates that one entity is produced, caused, or brought about as an outcome or consequence of another entity or process.
-
B.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
C.
providedFor
Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
-
D.
decides
Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
-
E.
demonstratedBy
Indicates that something is shown, proven, or made evident through the actions, behavior, or example of a particular entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246cbca108190a92478df126d9bf8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2464f61648190ac690044be194972 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.