Triple
T19003340
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Jutland |
E465011
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCoastOn |
P212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kattegat |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kattegat | Statement: [Central Jutland, hasCoastOn, Kattegat]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kattegat Context triple: [Central Jutland, hasCoastOn, Kattegat]
-
A.
Kattegat
chosen
Kattegat is a shallow sea area and strait between Denmark and Sweden that forms a key maritime passage linking the North Sea with the Baltic Sea.
-
B.
Skagerrak
Skagerrak is a strait and sea area between Norway, Denmark, and Sweden that connects the North Sea to the Baltic Sea.
-
C.
Bothnian Sea
The Bothnian Sea is the southern part of the Gulf of Bothnia, a brackish water basin between Sweden and Finland that forms a northern arm of the Baltic Sea.
-
D.
Lidingö strait
Lidingö strait is a narrow waterway in the Stockholm area separating the island of Lidingö from the mainland and forming part of the inner Stockholm archipelago.
-
E.
Øresund
Øresund is the strait between Denmark and Sweden that connects the Baltic Sea to the North Sea and is spanned by the Øresund Bridge.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd01a56c81909694a128c66b21d7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d6a252588190a40398b1879fb096 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:01 p.m.