Triple
T18995000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colour Me Free! |
E464785
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCoverArtControversy |
P51747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Colour Me Free!, hasCoverArtControversy, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoverArtControversy Context triple: [Colour Me Free!, hasCoverArtControversy, true]
-
A.
hasCoverArtFeaturing
Indicates that one entity’s cover art visually features or depicts another entity.
-
B.
originalCoverArtCensored
chosen
Indicates that the original version of the cover art has been altered, obscured, or restricted from display due to censorship.
-
C.
hasCoverArtVariant
Indicates that an item has an alternative version of its cover artwork distinct from the primary cover.
-
D.
hasCoverArtSource
Indicates that an entity’s cover art is derived from, or visually based on, another specified source entity.
-
E.
hasCoverArtTheme
Indicates that an item’s cover art visually represents or is characterized by a particular theme or motif.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd01a56c81909694a128c66b21d7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d680dd2881908a72e732c6b25477 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4a2f88e0c81908cb20f08bf24cd32 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:01 p.m.