Triple
T18970511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Planned Parenthood v. Abbott |
E464152
|
entity |
| Predicate | statuteInvolved |
P8819
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Texas House Bill 2 (2013) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas House Bill 2 (2013) | Statement: [Planned Parenthood v. Abbott, statuteInvolved, Texas House Bill 2 (2013)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Texas House Bill 2 (2013) Context triple: [Planned Parenthood v. Abbott, statuteInvolved, Texas House Bill 2 (2013)]
-
A.
House Bill 2 (2013)
chosen
House Bill 2 (2013) was a controversial Texas law that imposed strict regulations on abortion providers and facilities, leading to the closure of many clinics before being largely struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
B.
Carmell v. Texas
Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.
-
C.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
-
D.
Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
-
E.
Landrum–Griffin Act
The Landrum–Griffin Act is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1959 that regulates labor unions’ internal affairs and their officials’ relationships with employers to protect union members’ rights and prevent corruption.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd008af48190a97ff1c6488edf1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d619acbc8190acb49b3fae707758 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, noon