Triple
T18948181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ahr wine region |
E463570
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedAlong |
P2409
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ahr River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ahr River | Statement: [Ahr wine region, locatedAlong, Ahr River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ahr River Context triple: [Ahr wine region, locatedAlong, Ahr River]
-
A.
Ahr River
chosen
The Ahr River is a tributary of the Rhine in western Germany, known for flowing through the Eifel region and its surrounding wine-growing valleys.
-
B.
Aschaff River
The Aschaff River is a small river in Bavaria, Germany, that flows through the Spessart region before joining the Main River.
-
C.
Hase River
The Hase River is a river in northwestern Germany that flows through Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia before joining the Ems River.
-
D.
Inn River
The Inn River is a major Alpine river in Central Europe that flows through Switzerland, Austria, and Germany before joining the Danube.
-
E.
Würm River
The Würm River is a small river in Bavaria, Germany, known for flowing north from Lake Starnberg through towns such as Gauting and Starnberg before joining the Amper River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfec90481909e926be9767e5779 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d540e57c8190bb17fff6d4254320 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:59 a.m.