Triple
T18919
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Julius Robert Oppenheimer |
E373
|
entity |
| Predicate | languagesSpokenWrittenOrSigned |
P741
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Julius Robert Oppenheimer, languagesSpokenWrittenOrSigned, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languagesSpokenWrittenOrSigned Context triple: [Julius Robert Oppenheimer, languagesSpokenWrittenOrSigned, English]
-
A.
languagesSpoken
chosen
Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
-
B.
languageOfWorkOrName
Indicates the language in which a work is created or a name is expressed.
-
C.
recognizedLanguage
Indicates that an entity has identified, detected, or acknowledged a particular language as being used or present.
-
D.
languageOfRecords
Indicates the language in which the records are written or maintained.
-
E.
officialLanguage
Indicates that a particular language has been formally designated by an authority as the official language used for government, legal, or administrative purposes in a given jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246cbca108190a92478df126d9bf8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2464f61648190ac690044be194972 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.