Triple
T18907516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zurawski v. State of Texas |
E462503
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengesLaw |
P113447
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Texas near-total abortion ban |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas near-total abortion ban | Statement: [Zurawski v. State of Texas, challengesLaw, Texas near-total abortion ban]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengesLaw Context triple: [Zurawski v. State of Texas, challengesLaw, Texas near-total abortion ban]
-
A.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
B.
doctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
-
C.
legalInstrumentChallenged
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal instrument (such as a law, regulation, contract, or order) is being formally disputed or contested, typically through legal or administrative proceedings.
-
D.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
E.
lawJournal
Indicates a relationship where a work is published in, associated with, or appears within a specific law journal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfd05bc819088903cca13cc2846 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c52dcb948190a5b6a783512bf7d6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4a2e9e6488190ba8df92c8058ed88 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.