Triple

T18906902
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kansas judicial branch E462485 entity
Predicate hasAdministrativeOffice P1268 FINISHED
Object Office of Judicial Administration — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Office of Judicial Administration | Statement: [Kansas judicial branch, hasAdministrativeOffice, Office of Judicial Administration]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Office of Judicial Administration
Context triple: [Kansas judicial branch, hasAdministrativeOffice, Office of Judicial Administration]
  • A. Division of Judicial Services
    The Division of Judicial Services is an administrative unit of the International Criminal Court responsible for supporting the Court’s judicial proceedings and related operational functions.
  • B. Office of the State Court Administrator
    The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
  • C. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
  • D. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the administrative arm of the Arizona judicial branch responsible for overseeing court operations, policy implementation, and support services across the state’s court system.
  • E. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, budgeting, and policy implementation of Oklahoma’s state court system.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Office of Judicial Administration
Target entity description: The Office of Judicial Administration is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operations, policy implementation, and court services of the Kansas judicial branch.
  • A. Division of Judicial Services
    The Division of Judicial Services is an administrative unit of the International Criminal Court responsible for supporting the Court’s judicial proceedings and related operational functions.
  • B. Office of the State Court Administrator
    The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
  • C. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
  • D. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the administrative arm of the Arizona judicial branch responsible for overseeing court operations, policy implementation, and support services across the state’s court system.
  • E. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, budgeting, and policy implementation of Oklahoma’s state court system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfd05bc819088903cca13cc2846 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c52dcb948190a5b6a783512bf7d6 completed April 20, 2026, 6:18 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.