Triple
T1890201
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Snake Island |
E41856
|
entity |
| Predicate | disputedIn |
P26178
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case
The Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case was an International Court of Justice dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zones in the Black Sea, particularly around Snake Island.
|
E210209
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case | Statement: [Snake Island, disputedIn, Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case Context triple: [Snake Island, disputedIn, Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case]
-
A.
Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea
The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea is a multilateral treaty among the Caspian littoral states that defines their rights, obligations, and jurisdiction over the sea’s waters, seabed, and resources.
-
B.
Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide)
Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide) is a contentious case before the International Court of Justice in which Ukraine accuses Russia of misusing genocide claims as a pretext for its 2022 invasion and seeks a ruling on the interpretation and application of the Genocide Convention.
-
C.
Seabed Disputes Chamber
The Seabed Disputes Chamber is a specialized judicial body that settles legal disputes related to activities on the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
-
D.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
E.
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case Triple: [Snake Island, disputedIn, Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case]
Generated description
The Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case was an International Court of Justice dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zones in the Black Sea, particularly around Snake Island.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case Target entity description: The Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case was an International Court of Justice dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zones in the Black Sea, particularly around Snake Island.
-
A.
Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea
The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea is a multilateral treaty among the Caspian littoral states that defines their rights, obligations, and jurisdiction over the sea’s waters, seabed, and resources.
-
B.
Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide)
Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide) is a contentious case before the International Court of Justice in which Ukraine accuses Russia of misusing genocide claims as a pretext for its 2022 invasion and seeks a ruling on the interpretation and application of the Genocide Convention.
-
C.
Seabed Disputes Chamber
The Seabed Disputes Chamber is a specialized judicial body that settles legal disputes related to activities on the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
-
D.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
E.
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputedIn Context triple: [Snake Island, disputedIn, Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case]
-
A.
disputeInvolves
chosen
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
-
B.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
C.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
D.
disputedAspect
Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
-
E.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb14475448190b291ada3454bf98b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69addf665bd48190b08ff5159333b99b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ade02321b881909e8bb087f6c3acd4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 8:46 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ade0d3f77481909cb4c9a57a9fb6a7 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.