Triple
T188972
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Basic Latin |
E3675
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsScript |
P5713
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Latin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin | Statement: [Basic Latin, containsScript, Latin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsScript Context triple: [Basic Latin, containsScript, Latin]
-
A.
scriptType
Indicates the classification or category of a script, specifying what kind of script it is (e.g., its format, purpose, or scripting language type).
-
B.
script
Indicates that an entity is associated with a written text or code (such as a screenplay, program, or written instructions) that defines its content or behavior.
-
C.
officialScriptOf
Indicates that one writing system is formally designated as the standard or legally recognized script used for a particular language, region, or entity.
-
D.
scriptDirection
Indicates the direction in which a writing system or script is read or written (e.g., left-to-right, right-to-left, top-to-bottom).
-
E.
hasViewOnScripture
Indicates that an entity holds a particular interpretive stance or doctrinal position regarding scripture.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2594abeec8190a48f36817e647fcd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25672332081909386f35f3ca15dd2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25738b5108190866fd704fceee18a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.