Triple
T18890339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | socii of Rome |
E462068
|
entity |
| Predicate | composedOf |
P402
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sabines |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sabines | Statement: [socii of Rome, composedOf, Sabines]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sabines Context triple: [socii of Rome, composedOf, Sabines]
-
A.
Sabines
chosen
The Sabines were an ancient Italic people of central Italy, closely associated with early Roman history and culture.
-
B.
Senones
The Senones were an ancient Gallic tribe known for their settlements in central Italy and Gaul and for their role in early conflicts with the Roman Republic.
-
C.
Bruttians
The Bruttians were an ancient Italic people of southern Italy, known for their role in regional conflicts during the Hellenistic and Roman periods.
-
D.
Suessiones
The Suessiones were an ancient Celtic tribe of northern Gaul, known from Julius Caesar’s accounts as one of the principal Belgic peoples during the Gallic Wars.
-
E.
Sabiny
The Sabiny are an indigenous Nilotic-speaking ethnic group primarily inhabiting the mountainous areas of eastern Uganda, particularly around Mount Elgon.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfc3430819095ee6fc0eb4c06a5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c479f3208190a9d665865c4b630b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.