Triple
T18871195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intellectual Property Court (Portugal) |
E461570
|
entity |
| Predicate | higherCourt |
P6920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação) | Statement: [Intellectual Property Court (Portugal), higherCourt, Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação) Context triple: [Intellectual Property Court (Portugal), higherCourt, Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação)]
-
A.
Supreme Administrative Court of Portugal
The Supreme Administrative Court of Portugal is the highest court in the country for administrative and tax disputes, overseeing the legality of actions by public authorities.
-
B.
Court of Justice of Paraíba
The Court of Justice of Paraíba is the highest judicial authority of the Brazilian state of Paraíba, responsible for overseeing state-level civil and criminal justice and administering the judiciary within its jurisdiction.
-
C.
Maritime Court of Lisbon
The Maritime Court of Lisbon is a specialized Portuguese court that handles legal disputes and issues related to maritime activities, shipping, and navigation.
-
D.
House of Appeals of Brazil
The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
-
E.
Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação) Target entity description: The Portuguese Courts of Appeal (Tribunais da Relação) are intermediate appellate courts in Portugal’s judiciary that review decisions from lower courts in both civil and criminal matters.
-
A.
Supreme Administrative Court of Portugal
The Supreme Administrative Court of Portugal is the highest court in the country for administrative and tax disputes, overseeing the legality of actions by public authorities.
-
B.
Court of Justice of Paraíba
The Court of Justice of Paraíba is the highest judicial authority of the Brazilian state of Paraíba, responsible for overseeing state-level civil and criminal justice and administering the judiciary within its jurisdiction.
-
C.
Maritime Court of Lisbon
The Maritime Court of Lisbon is a specialized Portuguese court that handles legal disputes and issues related to maritime activities, shipping, and navigation.
-
D.
House of Appeals of Brazil
The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
-
E.
Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfb7b9c8190854e7b171b98ea2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c2a9dd04819083133ded30337962 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.